The Future of Physics

Physics is the science and study of how the universe works. Matter, motion, energy, space and time, are some areas of research in physics, although the boundaries of physics are not rigidly defined. Theoretical breakthroughs in physics could make significant contributions to many future technologies.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator complex, intended to collide opposing beams of protons or lead, two of several types of hadrons, at up to 99.99 percent the speed of light.

The LHC was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), and lies underneath the Franco-Swiss border between the Jura Mountains and the Alps near Geneva, Switzerland. It is funded by and built in collaboration with over 10,000 scientists and engineers from over 100 countries as well as hundreds of universities and laboratories with the intention of testing various predictions of high-energy physics, including the existence of the hypothesized Higgs boson.

Large Hadron Collider Articles and Web Sites

Infographic on how the LHC works

World's Supercollider Takes Big Step Forward

Miniature Black Holes Could Prove Parallel Universes

Large Hadron Collider team announces beginning of restart

Large Hadron Collider -- Chalk Talk - NSF video

Why a Large Hadron Collider?

Safety of particle collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

LHC web site

Are The Experiments Planned at the LHC Safe?

Could experiments at the Large Hadron Collider produce a man-made black hole? Is the LHC a doomsday device?

What types of phenomena could result from the world's most powerful experiments?

Strangelets
Microscopic black holes
Vacuum bubbles
Magnetic monopoles
Bose supernovas

Although I tried to understand strangelets, vacuum bubbles and the other objects that physicists speculate could result from LHC experiments, it is darn near impossible to find extra study time during the NASCAR season.

With my limited knowledge of physics, I have no choice but to put my trust in the majority of scientists that have stated there is no risk of LHC experiments creating man-made black holes or strangelets that will devour the Earth.

The problem is that there may not be a scientist anywhere that knows with certainty what to expect from these unprecedented experiments. As far as I can tell, physicists around the world do not agree on a single "theory of everything", and our current laws of physics do not exactly fit the quantum world. Scientists are anxiously awaiting the LHC experiments to help them find those answers.

I read in one of the articles linked below, that "we need the LHC experiments because there has not been a significant breakthrough in physics in over 30 years". My question is, what's the rush? Why can't we wait for the next Newton or Einstein to come along to develop theories that could more accurately predict the outcome of these experiments?

I would feel much more at ease if physicists could say, "So and so is what we expect to happen and these tests will prove it."

Instead of, "If string theory is correct, we should see... If not, maybe we'll find..."

or

"Strangelet production is therefore less likely..."

If and less likely should never be in the same article as doomsday.

Unfortunately, the people at the LHC do not seem overly concerned about my fears. If they were, they could have started out by calling the project something a little less ominous than Large Anything Collider... consider The Big Hadron Get Together. They also could have hired a spin doctor, like the politicians do, to soften the blow when mishaps occur. The headline 'Magnet Meltdown at the LHC', could have read 'Proton Party Gathers Steam'. I wouldn't be any safer, but I would sleep better.

What I find most unsettling, is that technologies like the Large Hadron Collider, nanotechnology and biotechnology, are moving forward at near-light speed, whether I feel they are dangerous to humanity or not--and for the record, I do.

Links and articles

Scientist warns that particle accelerator experiments could make Earth implode

What are the chances that a particle collider's strangelets will destroy the Earth?

Black Hole Production at LHC

Black Holes at the LHC - What can happen?

Physicists Hoping To Create Tiny Black Holes At CERN

Strangelet - Wikipedia

What is a Strangelet?

Forget black holes, could the LHC trigger a "Bose supernova"?

Will the world end on Wednesday?

Black holes from the LHC could survive for minutes

Trying To Make A Big Bang

How to Build a Wormhole

Wouldn't it be nice to have a wormhole of your own? You could build one end at your front door and the other end at your school or office. It turns out that it is not all that difficult. All you need is a decent sized neutron star, an electrical outlet (one of those 3 hole jobs), extension cords and of course, plenty of duct tape.

NASA's recipe for a wormhole:

First, collect a whole bunch of super-dense matter, such as matter from a neutron star. Enough to construct a ring the size of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. Then build another ring where you want the other end of your wormhole. Next, charge 'em up to some incredible voltage, and spin them up to near the speed of light -- both of them.

Step through worm hole. Adjust your watch if necessary as you may have arrived before you left.

Disclaimer: FFA is not responsible for the destruction of any universe or galaxies therein.

Find out more at NASA

Anti-Gravity

Before anti-gravity snow boarding can appear at the next Olympics, someone has to figure out exactly what gravity is. There is still a lot that we don't know. But we have come a long way since Newton. Scientists are now working on breaking, or at least bending, the laws of gravity by creating gravity shields, gravity reflectors and mass-reducers.

Check out this light list of gravity sites and articles:

Project Greenglow and the battle with gravity

Gravitation under human control

American Antigravity

The Antigravity Underground - wired.com

Cryogenic Gravity Shielding

Gravity Probe B